Prelude
I have
compared 45 different papers for markers. I have not included any papers that
are not specified for markers by the company that produce them. It is not
uncommon that an art store will market a paper as a marker-paper but if you
look at the brands homepage they are not label as a marker paper. But with that
said, a lot of other kinds of paper can work very well with markers, for
example watercolor paper (even though they will “eat” the ink in the marker a
lot faster than any other paper). I also tried some Japanese sumi-e paper with
good and interesting result. I might
write more about that in the future. For now, this is a marker paper review.
The theory and method
I will
start with a group of eight papers, the very thin paper for layout. I
categorized the thin layout paper as being between 45 g/m2 and
65 g/m2.
Since it is
layout paper and not drawing paper for final work, I will not test them to
harshly on properties as blending capacity or layering capacity. It isn´t after
all what the paper is meant to be.
I started
with some small samples to se color saturation and value, bleeding and
feathering to mention some of the things I look for. However, I am a firm
believer in working the paper as you normally would, to be able to fully
understand the potential the paper has, so I decided to do a drawing on every
paper.
Before I
started my drawing I wrote down the brand name of the paper. I then covered the
name so I wouldn't se which paper I was working on. I wanted it to be a blind
test.
I have
earlier tried to do the exact same drawing but find that that is only working
if you compare two or three items. When you compare many items (as I did; I
compared 29 markers) the chances are huge that the first couples of drawings
are a less good than the following (because you are learning) and the last ones
are pretty bad because it get so monotonous that it is very difficult to do a
good job. At least that is true for me. I therefore chose to draw every drawing
different but in the same manner and the same subject (in this case, one girl
stood model for all drawings). I also chose to use few colors so that the face
would have the exact same colors. I did the skin on every paper before moving
on to the hair since it where easier to compare the paper in that way. I let myself
have the freedom to use different hair colors after that.
Copic manga paper |
Copic Manga illustration paper
This is an
acid free 65 g/m2 A4 sized paper that comes in 30-sheet packs. They
are available in natural white (which are a 130 g/m2 paper) or pure
white (which this is). On the backside there is an illustration that you can
copy and color in.
The paper
has a dull feeling to the touch. It has a slight yellow tint. The front side
and the backside are the same, but they actually feel and react as a typically
backside, both of them. The paper bleeds through on to the surface underneath
almost immediately. This is however not a huge problem since it is easy to
handle by putting a paper you don't value underneath.
The backside with an illustration |
The colors
(in comparison to the other brands) are uneven and very grainy. The ink will
easily feather out. The colors look
lighter in comparison to other brands, this can be good if you want a lighter
color, but it can be difficult to get darker values. The ink resisted the paper
a little bit. The paper did not take more then one layer before puddles of ink
showed up.
Conclusion:
I think this is a very poor paper.
A drawing made on copic manga paper |
Copic manga samples |
Comparison |
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar